Borisovski v. Lamarre

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 27, 2020·No. 2020 NYSlipOp 50080(U)·Published

Opinion



Alexandre Borisovski, Plaintiff-Appellant,

against

Joseph Lamarre, Defendant-Respondent.


Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Judy H. Kim, J.), entered June 13, 2019, granting defendant's motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7).

Per Curiam.

Order (Judy H. Kim, J.), entered June 13, 2019, reversed, without costs, defendant's motion to dismiss is denied, and the action is reinstated.


Pretrial motions to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action should rarely, if ever, be entertained in Small Claims Court (see Friedman v Seward Park Hous. Corp., 167 Misc 2d 57 [App Term, 1st Dept 1995]; see also Rackowski v Araya, 152 AD3d 834, 836 [2017]), and no exception to the rule is warranted in this case. "Substantial justice" (CCA 1804) will best be rendered by a prompt trial, where defendant may assert his substantive arguments for dismissal.

In reinstating the action, we express no view as to its ultimate outcome on the merits.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur
Decision Date: January 27, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borisovski v. Lamarre, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Borisovski v. Lamarre (Borisovski v. Lamarre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rackowski v. Araya
2017 NY Slip Op 5481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Friedman v. Seward Park Housing Corp.
167 Misc. 2d 57 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)