Borgia v. State
489 So. 2d 112, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1162, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7850
Opinion
Appellant appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss which was based on entrapment and violation of due process. We affirm. See Yolman v. State, 473 So.2d 716 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We note that the jury found appellant guilty of the offense of trafficking in cocaine. Yet the written judgment states that appellant pled guilty to that offense. Therefore, we remand for correction of appellant’s judgment to reflect the verdict of the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borgia v. State, 489 So. 2d 112, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1162, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7850 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
489 So. 2d 112 (Borgia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crumley v. State
489 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)