Borgia v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Borgia v. State

489 So. 2d 112, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1162, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7850

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 14, 1986

DocketNo. 85-1371

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 489 So. 2d 112 (Borgia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borgia v. State, 489 So. 2d 112, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1162, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7850 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss which was based on entrapment and violation of due process. We affirm. See Yolman v. State, 473 So.2d 716 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We note that the jury found appellant guilty of the offense of trafficking in cocaine. Yet the written judgment states that appellant pled guilty to that offense. Therefore, we remand for correction of appellant’s judgment to reflect the verdict of the jury.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss which was based on entrapment and violation of due process. We affirm. See Yolman v. State, 473 So.2d 716 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We note that the jury found appellant guilty of the offense of trafficking in cocaine. Yet the written judgment states that appellant pled guilty to that offense. Therefore, we remand for correction of appellant’s judgment to reflect the verdict of the jury.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 So. 2d 112, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1162, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borgia-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack