Borghi v. Dismuke

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJune 18, 2007
Docket2007-MO-037
StatusUnpublished

This text of Borghi v. Dismuke (Borghi v. Dismuke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Borghi v. Dismuke, (S.C. 2007).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court


Carlo Borghi, Appellant,

v.

Robert C. Dismuke and Allcare Tree Surgery, Inc., Respondents.


Appeal From Beaufort County
 R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


Memorandum Opinion No.  2007-MO-037
 Heard June 6, 2007 – Filed June 18, 2007


AFFIRMED


David Holt Berry, of Hilton Head Island, for Appellant.

E. Mitchell Griffith, of Beaufort, for Respondents.


PER CURIAM:  Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220 (b)(1) and the following authorities:  Gray v. Southern Facilities, Inc., 256 S.C. 558, 183 S.E.2d 438 (1971); see also Bridger v. Asheville & S.R. Co., 27 S.C. 456, 3 S.E. 860 (1887).

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gray v. Southern Facilities, Inc.
183 S.E.2d 438 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1971)
Bridger v. Asheville & Spartanburg R. R.
3 S.E. 860 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Borghi v. Dismuke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borghi-v-dismuke-sc-2007.