Borghi v. Dismuke

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 18, 2007·No. 2007-MO-037·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court


Carlo Borghi, Appellant,

v.

Robert C. Dismuke and Allcare Tree Surgery, Inc., Respondents.


Appeal From Beaufort County
 R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


Memorandum Opinion No.  2007-MO-037
 Heard June 6, 2007 – Filed June 18, 2007


AFFIRMED


David Holt Berry, of Hilton Head Island, for Appellant.

E. Mitchell Griffith, of Beaufort, for Respondents.


PER CURIAM:  Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220 (b)(1) and the following authorities:  Gray v. Southern Facilities, Inc., 256 S.C. 558, 183 S.E.2d 438 (1971); see also Bridger v. Asheville & S.R. Co., 27 S.C. 456, 3 S.E. 860 (1887).

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borghi v. Dismuke, (S.C. 2007).

Borghi v. Dismuke (Borghi v. Dismuke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gray v. Southern Facilities, Inc.
183 S.E.2d 438 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1971)
Bridger v. Asheville & Spartanburg R. R.
3 S.E. 860 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1887)