Borgess Medical Center v. Sebelius

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Borgess Medical Center v. Sebelius. Read the opinion of the Court — 966 F. Supp. 2d 1
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided September 5, 2013·No. Civil Action No. 2012-0144·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BORGESS MEDICAL CENTER, et al. )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Case No. 12-144 (RJL)

)

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary ) Department of Health and Human Services )

)

Defendant. )

:t;;c·

(September~, 2013) (Dkts. ##19, 21)

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this ~ay of ~--

September 20 13, it is hereby

ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #21] is

GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #19] is

DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borgess Medical Center v. Sebelius, (D.D.C. 2013).

Borgess Medical Center v. Sebelius (Borgess Medical Center v. Sebelius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.