Borges v. County of Mendocino

District Court, N.D. California·Decided June 22, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-04537·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 6 7 ANN MARIE BORGES, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04537-SI

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS 9 v. JOHN MCCOWEN, GEORGEANN CROSKEY AND CARRE BROWN 10 COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, et al., WITHOUT PREJUDICE 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 61

12 13 Defendants have filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, and that motion is scheduled 14 for a hearing on July 9, 2021. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the 15 matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing. 16 Defendants John McCowen, Carre Brown, and Georgeanne Croskey assert that they have 17 been sued in their official capacities, and thus that plaintiffs’ claims against them should be 18 dismissed with prejudice because the official capacity claims are redundant of plaintiffs’ claims 19 against the County of Mendocino. See Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. Los Angeles County 20 Sheriff Dep’t, 533 F.3d 780, 799 (9th Cir. 2008) (“When both a municipal officer and a local 21 government entity are named, and the officer is named only in an official capacity, the court may 22 dismiss the officer as a redundant defendant.”). 23 Plaintiffs state that they do not oppose dismissal of defendants McCowen, Brown and 24 Croskey without prejudice. However, plaintiffs state that the first amended complaint was silent on 25 whether those defendants were sued in their official or individual capacities. Plaintiffs wish to 26 reserve their right to amend the complaint to sue these defendants in their individual capacities if 27 plaintiffs uncover evidence that defendants engaged in a conspiracy. “Unlike an official capacity 1 individual capacity claim ‘hinges upon [the individual defendant’s] participation in the deprivation 2 of constitutional rights.’” Torres v. Goddard, 793 F.3d 1046, 1057 (9th Cir. 2015) (internal citation 3 omitted). 4 The Court finds it appropriate to DISMISS plaintiffs’ claims against defendants McCowen, 5 Brown, and Croskey without prejudice to plaintiffs later seeking to allege individual capacity claims 6 against these defendants. 7 Sun Delta 10 Dated: June 22, 2021 SUSAN ILLSTON 11 United States District Judge a 12

15 16

= 17 6 Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borges v. County of Mendocino, (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Borges v. County of Mendocino (Borges v. County of Mendocino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related