Boress v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Boress v. State

902 So. 2d 852, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6101, 2005 WL 991683

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 29, 2005

DocketNo. 5D04-3157

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 902 So. 2d 852 (Boress v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boress v. State, 902 So. 2d 852, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6101, 2005 WL 991683 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (A trial court’s decision has the presumption of correctness, and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error, and without a record of the trial proceedings, the reviewing court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory).

SAWAYA, C.J, THOMPSON and PLEUS, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (A trial court’s decision has the presumption of correctness, and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error, and without a record of the trial proceedings, the reviewing court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory).

SAWAYA, C.J, THOMPSON and PLEUS, J.J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

902 So. 2d 852, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6101, 2005 WL 991683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boress-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack