Borenstein v. The Animal Foundation
Opinion
Nevada Bar No. 14923 4930 Mar Vista Way Las Vegas, Nevada 89121 Phone: (702) 526-4235 Fax: (702) 386-1946 Email: robertmelcic@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff Brian Borenstein
Nevada Bar No. 8602 THE PALMER LAW FIRM, P.C. 5550 Painted Mirage Road Suite 320 Las Vegas, Nevada 89149 Phone: (702) 952-9533 Email: rpalmer@plflawyers.com Attorney for Plaintiff Brian Borenstein
CASE NO.: 2:19-CV-00985-APG-DJA BRIAN BORENSTEIN, an individual, STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR Plaintiff, REB SR PI OA NN S B EO TR OE CN AS RTE LI YN S T CO H F OI LL TE E A N ’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. (First Request) THE ANIMAL FOUNDATION, et al.
Defendants.
Plaintiff BRIAN BORENSTEIN (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant The Animal Foundation (collectively, the “PARTIES”), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Brian Borenstein to respond to Defendant Carly Sholten’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 89), from September 9, 2020 to October 9, 2020. This request is made in good faith and is not for the purpose of undue delay. Defendant’s counsel has approved the form and content of this request and has authorized Plaintiff's counsel to affix her electronic signature hereto. STIPULATED AND AGREED by: DATED 4" day of September, 2020. DATED 4" day of September, 2020. REID RUBINSTEIN & BOGATZ By:/s/ Robert S. Melcic By:/s/ Kerry E. Kleiman Robert S. Melcic, Esq. Kerry. E. Kleiman, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14923 Nevada Bar No. 3367 4930 Mar Vista Way 300 South 4" Street, Suite 830 Las Vegas, Nevada 89121 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorney for Plaintiff, Attorneys for Defendant, Brian Borenstein The Animal Foundation DATED this 8th day of September, 2020.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Respectfully submitted by: By:/s/ Robert S. Melcic Robert S. Melcic, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14923 4930 Mar Vista Way Las Vegas, Nevada 89121
I hereby certify that I am not a party to this action and that on the 6th day of September 2020, I caused to be served a true and correct copy of foregoing STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR BRIAN BORENSTEIN TO FILE A RESPONSE TO CARLY SCHOLTEN’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT in following manner: (ELECTRONIC SERVICE) Pursuant to Rule 5-4 of the Local Rules of Civil Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, the above-referenced document was electronically filed on the date hereof and served through the Notice of Electronic Filing automatically generated by that Court’s facilities.
/s/ Robert S. Melcic________________________ Robert S. Melcic, Esq.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borenstein v. The Animal Foundation (Borenstein v. The Animal Foundation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.