Borenstein v. Borenstein
255 A.D. 970, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6081
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Borenstein v. Borenstein. Read the opinion of the Court — 258 A.D. 55 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1938·Published
Opinion
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyetr, JJ.; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion. — The date for the production of the documents to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borenstein v. Borenstein, 255 A.D. 970, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6081 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).
255 A.D. 970 (Borenstein v. Borenstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.