Boreana v. Facerkreidler

2 A.D.3d 1482, 769 N.Y.S.2d 762
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 2003
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.3d 1482 (Boreana v. Facerkreidler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boreana v. Facerkreidler, 2 A.D.3d 1482, 769 N.Y.S.2d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Lane, J.), entered October 24, 2002, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew with respect to defendants’ motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Boreanaz v Facer-Kreidler (2 AD3d 1481 [2003]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boreanaz v. Facer-Kreidler
2 A.D.3d 1481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 A.D.3d 1482, 769 N.Y.S.2d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boreana-v-facerkreidler-nyappdiv-2003.