Boreana v. Facerkreidler
2 A.D.3d 1482, 769 N.Y.S.2d 762
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 2003·No. Appeal No. 2·Published
Opinion
Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Lane, J.), entered October 24, 2002, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew with respect to defendants’ motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Boreanaz v Facer-Kreidler (2 AD3d 1481 [2003]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner and Kehoe, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boreana v. Facerkreidler, 2 A.D.3d 1482, 769 N.Y.S.2d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).
2 A.D.3d 1482 (Boreana v. Facerkreidler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boreanaz v. Facer-Kreidler
2 A.D.3d 1481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)