Bordner v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Bordner v. State Bar

218 Cal. 580

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 28, 1933

DocketS. F. No. 14826

StatusPublished

This text of 218 Cal. 580 (Bordner v. State Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bordner v. State Bar, 218 Cal. 580 (Cal. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

In this matter, the petition to review the order of the Board of Governors of The State Bar, recommending that the petitioner be suspended from the practice of law, was not filed in this court within sixty days after the filing of the certified copy of the decision of said Board of Governors with the clerk of this court. Petitioner has therefore failed to comply with section 26 of The State Bar Act (Stats. 1927, p. 41) fixing the time within which petitions for the review of orders of the Board of Governors must be filed. For this reason the petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

In this matter, the petition to review the order of the Board of Governors of The State Bar, recommending that the petitioner be suspended from the practice of law, was not filed in this court within sixty days after the filing of the certified copy of the decision of said Board of Governors with the clerk of this court. Petitioner has therefore failed to comply with section 26 of The State Bar Act (Stats. 1927, p. 41) fixing the time within which petitions for the review of orders of the Board of Governors must be filed. For this reason the petition is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 Cal. 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bordner-v-state-bar-cal-1933.