Borders v. State

941 So. 2d 1205, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19115, 2006 WL 3302500
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Borders v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 936 So. 2d 737
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 2006·No. No. 2D05-5515·Published

Opinion

THREADGILL, EDWARD F„ Senior Judge.

Herman Borders appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. We affirm Borders’ conviction without comment. However, we strike the imposition of $373 in costs of investigation and remand for further proceedings because the State failed to document its request for those costs. Hall v. State, 932 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Howard v. State, 920 So.2d 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). On remand, the costs may be reimposed if the State properly documents the costs. See Hall, 932 So.2d at 1169; Howard, 920 So.2d at 765.

Conviction affirmed; investigative costs award stricken; remanded with instructions.

STRINGER and LaROSE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borders v. State, 941 So. 2d 1205, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19115, 2006 WL 3302500 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

941 So. 2d 1205 (Borders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. State
932 So. 2d 1169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Howard v. State
920 So. 2d 764 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)