Borders v. State

162 So. 136, 26 Ala. App. 467, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 139
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 11, 1935
Docket4 Div. 105.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 162 So. 136 (Borders v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Borders v. State, 162 So. 136, 26 Ala. App. 467, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 139 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

It is provided in the act creating the court in which this prosecution was begun that, upon appeal (after conviction) to the circuit court, the solicitor “shall make a brief statement of the cause of complaint signed by him, in substantially the form prescribed by section 3843 of the Code” of Alabama of 1923. Loc. Acts 1931, p. 190, § 14. We find this was not done in this case, and, under our practice, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded. Collins v. State, 19 Ala. App. 516, 98 So. 488.

It is so ordered.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stegall v. State
628 So. 2d 1006 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)
Young v. City of Hokes Bluff
611 So. 2d 401 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Johnson v. State
197 So. 2d 466 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 So. 136, 26 Ala. App. 467, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borders-v-state-alactapp-1935.