Border v. Benge

12 Iowa 330
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided October 22, 1861·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Lowe, C. J.

Action of replevin between two constables, each of whom had an execution against one Ashbough. Plaintiff claims to have made his levy upon the mare in question on the 27th day of October, 1857, leaving the animal, however, in the possession of the defendant in the execution, without taking any delivery bond. The defendant effected his levy upon the same animal on the 2d day of November following, and reduced the property to his custody under said levy, and held the same till replevied by the plaintiff on the 11th of the same month. On the succeeding day (the 12th) the animal was sold on the execution in the plaintiff’s hands. No evidence that the defendant at the time he made his levy had any notice of the plaintiff’s prior levy.

Held, by the court, that under the above state of facts the defendant’s right of possession was paramount to the plaintiff’s. This being the law of the case the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Border v. Benge, 12 Iowa 330 (iowa 1861).

12 Iowa 330 (Border v. Benge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nockles v. Eggspieler
47 Iowa 400 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1877)
Knapp v. White
40 Wis. 143 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1876)
Crawford v. Newell
23 Iowa 453 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1867)