Border v. Benge
This text of 12 Iowa 330 (Border v. Benge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action of replevin between two constables, each of whom had an execution against one Ashbough. Plaintiff claims to have made his levy upon the mare in question on the 27th day of October, 1857, leaving the animal, however, in the possession of the defendant in the execution, without taking any delivery bond. The defendant effected his levy upon the same animal on the 2d day of November following, and reduced the property to his custody under said levy, and held the same till replevied by the plaintiff on the 11th of the same month. On the succeeding day (the 12th) the animal was sold on the execution in the plaintiff’s hands. No evidence that the defendant at the time he made his levy had any notice of the plaintiff’s prior levy.
Held, by the court, that under the above state of facts the defendant’s right of possession was paramount to the plaintiff’s. This being the law of the case the judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Iowa 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/border-v-benge-iowa-1861.