Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 914, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1618
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Border Brokerage Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 Cust. Ct. 16 →
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of dado saws similar in all material respects to those the subject of Border Brokerage Company, Inc. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 510, C.D. 2689), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Border Brokerage Co. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 914, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1618 (cusc 1967).
59 Cust. Ct. 914 (Border Brokerage Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Border Brokerage Co. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 510 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)