Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

6 Ct. Int'l Trade 262
United States Court of International Trade·Decided November 22, 1983·No. Court No. 75-9-02194·Published

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

This action is before the Court for determination of the proper classification of certain merchandise described on the invoices as “Madill type 071” Skidder towers or components thereof.1 They were classified under item 664.10, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by T.D. 68-9, and assessed with duty at 5.5 percent ad valorem. Said item provides for “elevators, hoists, winches, cranes, jacks, pulley tackle, belt conveyors, and other lifting, handling, loading or unloading machinery, and conveyors, all the foregoing and parts thereof not provided for in item 664.05.”

Plaintiff contends the imported merchandise is used for the harvesting of trees, and as such entitled to entry free of duty under item 666.00, TSUS, as agricultural implements. In United States v. Border Brokerage Co., 2 CIT 326 (1981) aff’d, United States v. Border Brokerage Co., 706 F.2d 1579 (Fed. Cir. 1983), the Court held following the decision in Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United States, 76 Cust. Ct. 42, C.D. 4634; 408 F. Supp. 1379 (1976) aff’d, United States v. Norman G. Jensen, 64 CCPA 51, C.A.D. 1183, 550 F.2d, 662 (1977) that the harvesting of trees constituted an agricultural pursuit, and merchandise used for such purposes to be within the provision for agricultural implements as provided for in item 666.00, TSUS.

Certain portions of the record in 2 CIT 326, supra, were incorporated in the instant case as well as six exhibits. The matter was set for trial in Portland, Oregon, and plaintiff introduced the testimony of four witnesses and fourteen exhibits were received on its behalf. Defendant offered the testimony of one witness and introduced two exhibits.

After the filing of plaintiffs brief, defendant has consented to entry of judgment in lieu of filing a brief. In view of the foregoing, judgment will be entered for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States, 6 Ct. Int'l Trade 262 (cit 1983).

6 Ct. Int'l Trade 262 (Border Brokerage Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The United States v. Border Brokerage Co., Inc.
706 F.2d 1579 (Federal Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Norman G. Jensen, Inc.
550 F.2d 662 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1977)
Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United States
76 Cust. Ct. 42 (U.S. Customs Court, 1976)