Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Bordentown Banking Co. v. Sparhawk

Bordentown Banking Co. v. Sparhawk

63 A. 752, 214 Pa. 334, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 657
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 12, 1906
DocketNo. 2; Appeal, No. 232
StatusPublished

This text of 63 A. 752 (Bordentown Banking Co. v. Sparhawk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bordentown Banking Co. v. Sparhawk, 63 A. 752, 214 Pa. 334, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 657 (Pa. 1906).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stewart,

The cause of action here is the same as in Bordentown Banking Co. v. Restein, ante, p. 331, just decided, and the affidavit of defense is precisely the same. For reasons stated in that case, this judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 A. 752, 214 Pa. 334, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bordentown-banking-co-v-sparhawk-pa-1906.