Borden v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Borden v. State

1930 OK CR 83, 287 P. 802, 46 Okla. Crim. 290, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 445

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 8, 1930

DocketNo. A-7078.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 83 (Borden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borden v. State, 1930 OK CR 83, 287 P. 802, 46 Okla. Crim. 290, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 445 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error was eonvieted in the district court of McIntosh county on a charge of assault with a dangerous weapon and sentenced by the court to serve one year in the state penitentiary. The verdict was returned on December 15, 1927. The motion for new trial was overruled, and judgment and sentence pronounced on December 21, 1927. The appeal was lodged in this court on the 21st day of June, 1928.

The state has filed a motion to dismiss the attempted appeal for the reason that no notice of appeal was served upon the clerk of the court and the county attorney, as required by section 2809, C. O. S. 1921. A careful examination of the record discloses that no notice of appeal was served on either the clerk of the court or the county attorney. This court has uniformly held that in such cases the court does not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal. Lucas v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 301, 210 Pac. 1040; Merritt v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 194, 249 Pac. 436; Lutke v. State, 37 Okla. Cr. 18, 255 Pac. 719.

For the reasons stated the motion of the Attorney General is sustained, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error was eonvieted in the district court of McIntosh county on a charge of assault with a dangerous weapon and sentenced by the court to serve one year in the state penitentiary. The verdict was returned on December 15, 1927. The motion for new trial was overruled, and judgment and sentence pronounced on December 21, 1927. The appeal was lodged in this court on the 21st day of June, 1928.

The state has filed a motion to dismiss the attempted appeal for the reason that no notice of appeal was served upon the clerk of the court and the county attorney, as required by section 2809, C. O. S. 1921. A careful examination of the record discloses that no notice of appeal was served on either the clerk of the court or the county attorney. This court has uniformly held that in such cases the court does not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal. Lucas v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 301, 210 Pac. 1040; Merritt v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 194, 249 Pac. 436; Lutke v. State, 37 Okla. Cr. 18, 255 Pac. 719.

For the reasons stated the motion of the Attorney General is sustained, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 83, 287 P. 802, 46 Okla. Crim. 290, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borden-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack