Borden v. State
608 So. 2d 540, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12013, 1992 WL 335895
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1992·No. No. 92-342·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Alfred Borden appeals his convictions and sentences for robbery and trespass. Assuming arguendo that defendant’s objection to the flight instruction was sufficient [541]*541to preserve the point for appeal, see Bryant v. State, 602 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA), petition for review filed, No. 80,522 (Fla. Sept. 25,1992), we find that any possible error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See also Viniegra v. State, 604 So.2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (on reh’g). The remaining point on appeal is without merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borden v. State, 608 So. 2d 540, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12013, 1992 WL 335895 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
608 So. 2d 540 (Borden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. State
608 So. 2d 540 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)