Borden v. State
This text of 608 So. 2d 540 (Borden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Alfred Borden appeals his convictions and sentences for robbery and trespass. Assuming arguendo that defendant’s objection to the flight instruction was sufficient [541]*541to preserve the point for appeal, see Bryant v. State, 602 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA), petition for review filed, No. 80,522 (Fla. Sept. 25,1992), we find that any possible error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See also Viniegra v. State, 604 So.2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (on reh’g). The remaining point on appeal is without merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
608 So. 2d 540, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12013, 1992 WL 335895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borden-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.