Borden v. Industrial Finance Co., Inc.
This text of 214 S.W.2d 363 (Borden v. Industrial Finance Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The validity of appellants ’ tax title is the issue. With becoming candor counsel for appellants say: “There is but one vital issue presented by this appeal. At the outset we agree that if Lumsden v. Erstine, 205 Ark. 1004, 172 S. W. 2d 409, 147 A. L. R. 1132, is yet the law in this State, then this case must be affirmed. ’ ’
It is true that Lumsden v. Erstine was decided by a divided Court, but the case has been subsequently cited with approval in opinions to which there were no recorded dissents. Lumsden v. Erstine has become a rule of property, and we continue to adhere to the holding of that case.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 S.W.2d 363, 214 Ark. 13, 1948 Ark. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borden-v-industrial-finance-co-inc-ark-1948.