Borden v. Brown
7 Mass. 93
Opinion
Reviews are provided only where the original action is commenced by writ. We have had frequent applications of this kind, as well as for reviews, where judgment has been rendered on reports of referees, pursuant to a submission before a justice of the peace under the statute of 1786, c. 21; but we have uniformly refused such applications, on the ground that the laws authorizing reviews do not extend to such cases. The petitioner can take nothing by his petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borden v. Brown, 7 Mass. 93 (Mass. 1810).
7 Mass. 93 (Borden v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nantasket Beach Railroad v. Ransom
17 N.E. 640 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
Hubon v. Bousley
123 Mass. 368 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1877)
Nichols v. Nichols
28 Vt. 228 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1856)
Sheafe v. Sheafe
29 N.H. 269 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1854)
Lucas v. Lucas
69 Mass. 136 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1854)
Weld v. Sabin
20 N.H. 533 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1847)