Borden v. Briggs

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Borden v. Briggs

3 R.I. Dec. 166

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided June 24, 1926·No. No.70067·Published

Opinion

RESCRIPT'

TANNER, P. J.

This case is • heard upon motion to.remove default.

The motion was opposed and request made that it • be granted only upon the condition. that the defendant should not be allowed to plead the statute- of limitations. . .

According to the weight of authority such a condition should not be imposed and we therefore grant the':l motion without condition.

Motion of the defendant that he be given ten days from the entry of the order within which to file hi's' pleadings is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RESCRIPT'

TANNER, P. J.

This case is • heard upon motion to.remove default.

The motion was opposed and request made that it • be granted only upon the condition. that the defendant should not be allowed to plead the statute- of limitations. . .

According to the weight of authority such a condition should not be imposed and we therefore grant the':l motion without condition.

Motion of the defendant that he be given ten days from the entry of the order within which to file hi's' pleadings is granted.

Borden v. Briggs, 3 R.I. Dec. 166 (R.I. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

3 R.I. Dec. 166 (Borden v. Briggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.