Borden (Frederick) Vs. The Second Jud. Dist. Ct.

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: August 3, 2020
• Docket: 81478
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

FREDRICK D. BORDEN, No. 81478 Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE, AUG 0 3 2020 Res ondent. ELIZABETH A BROWN CLERK OF T.ORI.-7.V1/1 COURT BY DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus wherein petitioner contends he is being held in prison illegally and the Nevada Department of Corrections is not providing necessary medications to petitioner. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

SUPRBAE COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947*

, it. • •-, E-4A44;j4e, ••• • - y440 We reiterate that "[p]etitioned ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

Pieku , C.J. Pickering

LIAA , J. A'aicsi-f) Hardesty Stiglich

cc: Fredrick D. Borden Attorney General/Carson City Washoe District Court Clerk

'Petitioner's failure to provide timely proof of service of the petition constitutes an additional basis upon which to deny relief. NRAP 21(a)(1). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 101 1947A algOta

•