Bordelon v. Dauzat

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Bordelon v. Dauzat

145 So. 2d 45, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 2379

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 24, 1962

DocketNo. 607

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 145 So. 2d 45 (Bordelon v. Dauzat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bordelon v. Dauzat, 145 So. 2d 45, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 2379 (La. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

TATE, Judge.

This is a suit to cancel a mortgage on the ground that there was no consideration for the note secured thereby and also that the petitioner was misled into signing it by misrepresentation and error. It is a companion suit to Dauzat v. Bordelon, La.App., 145 So.2d 41, rendered this same date, a foreclosure suit by the holder of the note which was secured by the mortgage sought to be cancelled herein. .

For the reasons stated in the cited companion suit, by which we concluded that the note in question was supported by valid consideration, the judgment herein ordering cancellation of the mortgage pursuant to the present plaintiff’s demand is reversed; and the present plaintiff’s suit is dismissed at his cost.

Reversed.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI