Borde v. Lazarus, Michel & Lazarus

7 Teiss. 337, 1910 La. App. LEXIS 68
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided April 18, 1910·No. No. 4944·Published

Opinion

GODCHAUX, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants for $250, for expert services rendered. The defendant’s answer claimed that the charge was excessive, pleaded that the proper and real amount' due, namely, $150, had been tendered to plaintiff and prayed that the amount tendered be made the judgment of the Court.

It is evident from the pleadings that the amount in dispute, one hundred dollars ($100.00), is below our minimum jurisdiction as fixed by the Constitution.

State Ex Rel. Taylor vs. Judges Court of Appeal, 107 La. 784; Cloverland Dairy Company vs. Calecas, No. 4926 of our docket, and Valdejo vs. Zeigler, No. 4965 of our docket, both recently decided.

Accordingly this Court must take cognizance of its lack of jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal, and it is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borde v. Lazarus, Michel & Lazarus, 7 Teiss. 337, 1910 La. App. LEXIS 68 (La. Ct. App. 1910).

7 Teiss. 337 (Borde v. Lazarus, Michel & Lazarus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Taylor v. Judges of the Court of Appeal
107 La. 784 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1901)