Borda v. New York State Division of Parole

219 A.D.2d 843, 632 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10919

This text of 219 A.D.2d 843 (Borda v. New York State Division of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Borda v. New York State Division of Parole, 219 A.D.2d 843, 632 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Because respondent’s determination was made in accordance with statutory requirements, it is not subject to judicial review (see, Matter of Gaithor v Russi, 186 AD2d 1048). We reject petitioner’s argument that respondent considered only the seriousness of petitioner’s offense in reaching its determination, and we conclude that it considered only the relevant guidelines (cf., Matter of King v New York State Div. of Parole, 83 NY2d 788, 790-791). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present— Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF KING v. New York State Div. of Parole
632 N.E.2d 1277 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
Gaithor v. Russi
186 A.D.2d 1048 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 A.D.2d 843, 632 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borda-v-new-york-state-division-of-parole-nyappdiv-1995.