Borckman's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Borckman's Appeal

10 A. 425, 2 Sadler 518, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 651

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 24, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 A. 425 (Borckman's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borckman's Appeal, 10 A. 425, 2 Sadler 518, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 651 (Pa. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The learned judge committed no error in refusing the relief’ prayed for by the plaintiff, nor in decreeing that the bill be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff therein.

In the absence of any cross bill asking therefor, the portion of the decree as to the force and effect to be given to the articles, of separation is unauthorized; and to the extent of striking out' that part of the decree it is amended.

Thus modified the decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The learned judge committed no error in refusing the relief’ prayed for by the plaintiff, nor in decreeing that the bill be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff therein.

In the absence of any cross bill asking therefor, the portion of the decree as to the force and effect to be given to the articles, of separation is unauthorized; and to the extent of striking out' that part of the decree it is amended.

Thus modified the decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A. 425, 2 Sadler 518, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borckmans-appeal-pa-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack