Borcherling v. Downs

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Borcherling v. Downs

30 A.2d 28, 133 N.J. Eq. 23

DecidedJanuary 5, 1943

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.2d 28 (Borcherling v. Downs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Borcherling v. Downs, 30 A.2d 28, 133 N.J. Eq. 23 (N.J. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant seeks to have set aside an order dismissing her petition to open and set aside a consent final decree entered on December 5th, 1938.

A careful review of the proofs leads to the conclusion that they do not support appellant’s claim of fraud or duress in the entry of the final decree and fail to support the claim that there was an abuse of discretion in the action of the *24 Vice-Chancellor in advising that the petition to open and set aside said decree be dismissed.

The order under review is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI