Borchardt v. Demas

187 F.2d 517, 88 U.S. App. D.C. 175
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 8, 1951·No. 10699_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, decreeing specific performance against the vendor under an agreement granting an option for the purchase of stock in a closely-held corporation. We consider that the findings of fact of the trial court are supported by the evidence, and that the conditions of exercise of the option were met on a timely and adequate basis. Grice v. Jones, 33 App.D.C. 278; 3 Pomeroy’s Equity Jurisprudence (5th ed.) § 965. As we find no prejudicial error in the record, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Borchardt v. Demas, 187 F.2d 517, 88 U.S. App. D.C. 175 (D.C. Cir. 1951).

187 F.2d 517 (Borchardt v. Demas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. Howard University
60 A.3d 749 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)