Bopp v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bopp v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Read the opinion of the Court — 740 F. Supp. 2d 12
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided September 22, 2010·No. Civil Action No. 2009-1736·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

RICARDO BOPP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 09-1736 (RJL) ) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this

2,0fa· of September, 2010, hereby day

ORDERED that Wells Fargo, World, and Wachovia's Motion To Dismiss [#5] is

GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Wells Fargo, World, and Wachovia's Motion for More Definite

Statement and to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs Complaint [#6] is DENIED AS MOOT.

SO ORDERED.

" ~ RICHARD ON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bopp v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (D.D.C. 2010).

Bopp v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Bopp v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.