Bopp v. STAFFING SOLUTIONS SOUTHWEST, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bopp v. STAFFING SOLUTIONS SOUTHWEST, INC.

314 S.W.3d 437, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 901, 2010 WL 2590477

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 29, 2010

DocketED 94083, ED 94085

StatusPublished

This text of 314 S.W.3d 437 (Bopp v. STAFFING SOLUTIONS SOUTHWEST, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bopp v. STAFFING SOLUTIONS SOUTHWEST, INC., 314 S.W.3d 437, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 901, 2010 WL 2590477 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, claimant, Thomas Bopp, appeals from two orders of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission). The first order disqualified him from receiving unemployment benefits and affirmed the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security (the Appeals Tribunal) that claimant left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work or his employer. The second order affirmed the decision of the Appeals Tribunal that claimant was overpaid benefits. The orders of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the orders of the Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, claimant, Thomas Bopp, appeals from two orders of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission). The first order disqualified him from receiving unemployment benefits and affirmed the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security (the Appeals Tribunal) that claimant left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work or his employer. The second order affirmed the decision of the Appeals Tribunal that claimant was overpaid benefits. The orders of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the orders of the Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

314 S.W.3d 437, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 901, 2010 WL 2590477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bopp-v-staffing-solutions-southwest-inc-moctapp-2010.