Booz v. Batty

21 S.E. 848, 94 Ga. 669, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 255
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 6, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 S.E. 848 (Booz v. Batty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Booz v. Batty, 21 S.E. 848, 94 Ga. 669, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 255 (Ga. 1894).

Opinion

Suit was brought in justice’s court on three promissory notes. Defendant had judgment in each, and appeals were taken to the superior court, where the cases were consolidated. Plaintiff moved for judgment in his favor, because the suits were upon unconditional contracts and no written plea had been filed in the justice’s court. Thereupon defendant offered a written plea setting up the defence of payment; and offered to show to the court that the defence therein set forth was made to the suits in the justice’s court, and that no point or objection was made there on the ground that the defence was not reduced to writing. This was overruled by the court, thé plea disallowed, and judgment for plaintiff rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montgomery v. Fouche
53 S.E. 767 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 S.E. 848, 94 Ga. 669, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booz-v-batty-ga-1894.