Booye v. Matthews

36 A. 1128, 58 N.J.L. 697, 29 Vroom 697, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 58
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 15, 1896
StatusPublished

This text of 36 A. 1128 (Booye v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Booye v. Matthews, 36 A. 1128, 58 N.J.L. 697, 29 Vroom 697, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 58 (N.J. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is reversed.

For affirmance—None.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Dixon, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Magie, Van Syckel, Barkalow, Bogert, Brown, Nixon. 13.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 A. 1128, 58 N.J.L. 697, 29 Vroom 697, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booye-v-matthews-nj-1896.