Home/Indiana Court of Appeals/Bootz Mfg. Co. v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Employment Security Division

Bootz Mfg. Co. v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Employment Security Division

238 N.E.2d 472, 143 Ind. App. 111, 1968 Ind. App. LEXIS 447
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 12, 1968
DocketNo. 567A1
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 238 N.E.2d 472 (Bootz Mfg. Co. v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Employment Security Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bootz Mfg. Co. v. Review Bd. of the Indiana Employment Security Division, 238 N.E.2d 472, 143 Ind. App. 111, 1968 Ind. App. LEXIS 447 (Ind. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Prime, J.

The appellant herein on June 27, 1968, filed its Petition for Rehearing supported by briefs.

On. July 1, 1968, duplicate briefs were filed by the appellant containing proper signatures of counsel which signatures were omitted on the original briefs.

On July 5, 1968, the appellees filed their Petition to Dismiss the Petition for Rehearing properly supported by briefs and on July 9, 1968, appellants filed response to said Petition to Dismiss.

The petition to dismiss appellant’s rehearing petition alleges that-the application, for rehearing fails to concisely state the reasons why the decision is thought-to be erroneous, separate arid apart from the argument arid citations contained in the brief.

We Relieve, that the Petition for Rehearing meets the requirements of Rulé 2-22 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Indiana arid we therefore overrulé the Petition to Dismiss.

Upon consideration of the merits of the Petition for Rehearing wé conclude that no question has' been raised that was riot disposed of in the opinion.

, Thq ¡case was presented to this court by briefs. from both parties together with numerous briefs by Amicus Curiae. The matter was thoroughly embraced by all parties.

Finding;, no substantial grounds to justify a reconsideration of this matter, the Petition for Rehearing is denied. . .

Carson, C.J.,:Cooper and Faulconer, J.J., concur.

Note. — Reported in 238 N. E. 2d 472.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee-Norse Co. v. Rutledge
291 S.E.2d 477 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1982)
Gold Bond Building Products Division National Gypsum Co. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division
349 N.E.2d 258 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1976)
GOLD BOND BLDG. PROD. DIV., ETC. v. Review Bd., Ind.
349 N.E.2d 258 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1976)
Adams v. Industrial Commission
490 S.W.2d 77 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1973)
City Pattern v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division
263 N.E.2d 218 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1970)
International Steel Co. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division
252 N.E.2d 848 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1969)
Ind. Bell Tel. v. Rev. Bd.
250 N.E.2d 24 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1969)
Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
250 N.E.2d 24 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 N.E.2d 472, 143 Ind. App. 111, 1968 Ind. App. LEXIS 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bootz-mfg-co-v-review-bd-of-the-indiana-employment-security-division-indctapp-1968.