Booth's Will

61 P. 1135, 40 Or. 154
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 2, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 61 P. 1135 (Booth's Will) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Booth's Will, 61 P. 1135, 40 Or. 154 (Or. 1901).

Opinions

On Motion to Advance for Hearing.

Submitted without oral argument.

Per Curiam.

1. The motion to advance in this case must be denied. It is a civil action, involving no question of public importance, and, under Rule 16 of the Supreme .Court of Oregon (35 Or. 587, 600) must come up for argument in the order of its entry on the trial docket. An early hearing is no doubt important to the immediate parties litigant; but the same is probably true of the other eases entitled to precedence over it, and it would be unjust to them to advance it out of its Order.

Motion Overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Crohn
494 P.2d 258 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1972)
Yettick v. City of St. Helens
356 P.2d 553 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1960)
Branchflower v. Massey
208 P.2d 341 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1949)
In Re Shepherd's Estate
194 P.2d 425 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1948)
Red Eagle v. Rogers
107 P.2d 999 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1940)
In Re Mo-Se-Che-He's Estate
1940 OK 453 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1940)
In Re Walters' Estate
104 P.2d 968 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1940)
Roebling v. Walters
104 P.2d 968 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1940)
Rorick v. Dalles City
12 P.2d 762 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1932)
Large v. Diercken
243 P. 862 (California Supreme Court, 1926)
Messick v. Duby
168 P. 628 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1917)
Benson v. Withycombe
166 P. 41 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1917)
Pacific Elevator Co. v. Portland
133 P. 72 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1913)
State ex rel. v. Malheur County Court
101 P. 907 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1909)
Calbreath v. Dunbar
81 P. 366 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1905)
Sandys v. Williams
80 P. 642 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 P. 1135, 40 Or. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booths-will-or-1901.