Boothe v. Schultz

371 S.W.2d 88, 1963 Tex. App. LEXIS 1685
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 13, 1963·No. No. 7302·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Justice.

Delmar Durrett filed suit in the District Court of Deaf Smith County, Texas, against J. O. Boothe, G. W. Simmons, E. A. Edwards, and J. G. Evans on a promissory-note styled Delmar Durrett v. G. W. Simmons, et al., No. 4249 on the docket of the District Court of Deaf Smith County, Texas, and J. O. Boothe filed a cross action in said case against the said Delmar Durrett, G. W. Simmons, E. A. Edwards, and J. G. [89]*89Evans. The District Court of Deaf Smith County, Texas, entered judgment by default in favor of Delmar Durrett, plaintiff, against J. O. Boothe. G. W. Simmons, E. A. Edwards, and J. G. Evans on said note and dismissed the cross action of the said J. O. Boothe for want of prosecution.

Thereafter this court reversed and remanded said case; whereupon, Delmar Durrett, G. W. Simmons, E. A. Edwards, and J. G. Evans filed an application for writ of error in the Supreme Court of the State of Texas, and the Supreme Court of the State of Texas denied such application for writ of error, and in May of 1961 overruled the motion for rehearing on said application for writ of error.

No mandate has ever been issued by this court in said cause. The clerk of this court executed and issued a certificate on March 5, 1963, reciting that this court reversed and remanded this case on December 12, 1960, and that no mandate was taken out in said cause which certificate was filed in the District Court of Deaf Smith County, Texas, on March 6, 1963. Prior to the filing of the certificate issued by the clerk of this court, the trial court had dismissed Boothe’s cross action for the want of prosecution; but after the certificate of the clerk was filed in the District Court in Cause No. 4249 showing no mandate had been issued, the trial judge took further action as hereafter stated.

On April 3, 1963, the Honorable Harry H. Schultz, District Judge of Deaf Smith County, Texas, entered an order dismissing said Cause No. 4249 under Rule 445 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, which order reads as follows:

a6qaVkfStDXDyqMZVh7NsPJohpVHM6w8mmHl0Qwrj2ZYeTTDyqMZVh7NsPJohpVHM6w8mmHl0Qwrj2ZYeTTDyqMZVh7NsPJoyljO

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boothe v. Schultz, 371 S.W.2d 88, 1963 Tex. App. LEXIS 1685 (Tex. Ct. App. 1963).

371 S.W.2d 88 (Boothe v. Schultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brazzel v. Murray
472 S.W.2d 814 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)
Bayoud v. Nassour
408 S.W.2d 344 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)