Boothe v. Driver

Indiana Supreme Court

Boothe v. Driver

44 Ind. 470

DecidedNovember 15, 1873

StatusPublished

This text of 44 Ind. 470 (Boothe v. Driver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boothe v. Driver, 44 Ind. 470 (Ind. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Downey, C. J.

This was an action by the appellees against the appellants, to foreclose a mortgage. In the circuit court, there was judgment for the plaintiffs. Time was given in which to file a bill of exceptions, but none was ever filed. The error assigned is the overruling of a motion made by the defendants for a new trial. There being no bill of excep[471]*471tions in the record, and no question presented not dependent upon a bill of exceptions, there is nothing for us to decide.

The judgment is affirmed, with four per-cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Downey, C. J.

This was an action by the appellees against the appellants, to foreclose a mortgage. In the circuit court, there was judgment for the plaintiffs. Time was given in which to file a bill of exceptions, but none was ever filed. The error assigned is the overruling of a motion made by the defendants for a new trial. There being no bill of excep[471]*471tions in the record, and no question presented not dependent upon a bill of exceptions, there is nothing for us to decide.

The judgment is affirmed, with four per-cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 Ind. 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boothe-v-driver-ind-1873.