Booth v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Booth v. United States

63 Cust. Ct. 179, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3778

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 6, 1969

DocketC.D. 3893

StatusPublished

This text of 63 Cust. Ct. 179 (Booth v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Booth v. United States, 63 Cust. Ct. 179, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3778 (cusc 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

RoseNSTeiN, Judge:

When the protests set forth in schedule A, attached hereto and made a part of this decision, were called at a term of court in New York on June 16, 1969, plaintiff moved to suspend them under protest 67/28416.

It appearing that no action had been taken by counsel in protest 67/28416 other than to file a motion for a commission to take the deposition of someone in Pakistan the previous week, that there was no satisfactory showing that counsel would proceed to trial therein, and that the subject protests, which were marked peremptorily, were on the trial calendar for the seventh time, the court, sua sponte, ordered their dismissal. The cases are therefore dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RoseNSTeiN, Judge:

When the protests set forth in schedule A, attached hereto and made a part of this decision, were called at a term of court in New York on June 16, 1969, plaintiff moved to suspend them under protest 67/28416.

It appearing that no action had been taken by counsel in protest 67/28416 other than to file a motion for a commission to take the deposition of someone in Pakistan the previous week, that there was no satisfactory showing that counsel would proceed to trial therein, and that the subject protests, which were marked peremptorily, were on the trial calendar for the seventh time, the court, sua sponte, ordered their dismissal. The cases are therefore dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 Cust. Ct. 179, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booth-v-united-states-cusc-1969.