Booth v. Travelers Insurance Co.

452 So. 2d 1083, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14432
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 11, 1984
DocketNo. 82-2527
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 452 So. 2d 1083 (Booth v. Travelers Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Booth v. Travelers Insurance Co., 452 So. 2d 1083, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14432 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

ON MOTION TO REVERSE

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing her complaint for failure to state a cause of action. We reverse and remand pursuant to the agreement of the parties, and the authority of Migliore v. Crown Liquors of Broward, Inc., 448 So.2d 978 (Fla.1984), where the Supreme Court held that a vendor who sells intoxicating beverages to a minor contrary to § 562.11, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1978) prior to the effective date of § 768.125, Fla.Stat. (1981) may be liable in negligence to third persons injured by the minor’s operation of a motor vehicle.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hirst v. Hirst
452 So. 2d 1083 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
452 So. 2d 1083, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booth-v-travelers-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1984.