Booth v. State
730 So. 2d 863, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5972, 1999 WL 285732
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Booth v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 687 So. 2d 335 →
Opinion
We affirm the judgment and sentence entered, without prejudice to appellant’s right to raise in the future issues not previously raised. See Cody v. State, 678 So.2d 9 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Loren v. State, 601 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Booth v. State, 730 So. 2d 863, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5972, 1999 WL 285732 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
730 So. 2d 863 (Booth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Loren v. State
601 So. 2d 271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cody v. State
678 So. 2d 9 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)