Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Booth v. State

Booth v. State

105 So. 912, 21 Ala. App. 160, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 285
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 3, 1925
Docket2 Div. 347.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 105 So. 912 (Booth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Booth v. State, 105 So. 912, 21 Ala. App. 160, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 285 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

RICE, J.

The defendants were jointly charged, tried, and convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws. The proceedings were had on an affidavit and warrant made before and issued by S. C. Rolen, a justice of the peace in and for Bibb county, and made returnable to the circuit court. There was no plea in abatement interposed by defendants in the circuit court; so there was no error which this court will review. Sanders v. State, 16 Ala. App. 531, 79 So. 312.

There was ample evidence to support the judgment rendered by the court sitting without a jury, and, there being no error apparent on the record, the case is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Dothan v. Holloway
501 So. 2d 1136 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1986)
Gladden v. State
54 So. 2d 607 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1951)
Henderson v. State
53 So. 2d 624 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1951)
Bolling v. State
107 So. 40 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 So. 912, 21 Ala. App. 160, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booth-v-state-alactapp-1925.