Booth v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Booth v. State

105 So. 912, 21 Ala. App. 160, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 285

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 3, 1925·No. 2 Div. 347.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

RICE, J.

The defendants were jointly charged, tried, and convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws. The proceedings were had on an affidavit and warrant made before and issued by S. C. Rolen, a justice of the peace in and for Bibb county, and made returnable to the circuit court. There was no plea in abatement interposed by defendants in the circuit court; so there was no error which this court will review. Sanders v. State, 16 Ala. App. 531, 79 So. 312.

There was ample evidence to support the judgment rendered by the court sitting without a jury, and, there being no error apparent on the record, the case is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

The defendants were jointly charged, tried, and convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws. The proceedings were had on an affidavit and warrant made before and issued by S. C. Rolen, a justice of the peace in and for Bibb county, and made returnable to the circuit court. There was no plea in abatement interposed by defendants in the circuit court; so there was no error which this court will review. Sanders v. State, 16 Ala. App. 531, 79 So. 312.

There was ample evidence to support the judgment rendered by the court sitting without a jury, and, there being no error apparent on the record, the case is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Booth v. State, 105 So. 912, 21 Ala. App. 160, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 285 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

105 So. 912 (Booth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related