Booth v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

879 A.2d 156, 583 Pa. 429, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1356
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 28, 2005·No. 164 MAL 2005·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2005, the Application for Expedited Consideration or Remand and the Petition for Allowance of Appeal are hereby GRANTED and the order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED. Commonwealth v. Kyle, 582 Pa. 624, 874 A.2d 12 (2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Booth v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, 879 A.2d 156, 583 Pa. 429, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1356 (Pa. 2005).

879 A.2d 156 (Booth v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Maxwell
932 A.2d 941 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)
Johnson v. Murray
888 A.2d 28 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2005)
Canty v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
887 A.2d 831 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2005)