Booth v. Moran

Second Circuit

Booth v. Moran

135 F. 519, 68 C.C.A. 69, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4348

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 6, 1905

DocketNos. 97, 98

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 135 F. 519 (Booth v. Moran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Booth v. Moran, 135 F. 519, 68 C.C.A. 69, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4348 (2d Cir. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We concur fully with the District Judge. The proximate cause of the collision was the condition of dumper No. 3, which made it impossible to give her a port helm. The disrepair which produced this condition had existed several days, was known to master and owners, and had not been communicated to the tug which had her in tow, and which was entitled to assume she could be steered.

The decree is affirmed, with interest and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We concur fully with the District Judge. The proximate cause of the collision was the condition of dumper No. 3, which made it impossible to give her a port helm. The disrepair which produced this condition had existed several days, was known to master and owners, and had not been communicated to the tug which had her in tow, and which was entitled to assume she could be steered.

The decree is affirmed, with interest and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 F. 519, 68 C.C.A. 69, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booth-v-moran-ca2-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack