Booth v. Merchants Bank of Valdosta

72 S.E. 44, 9 Ga. App. 650, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 276
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 11, 1911·No. 2948·Published

Opinion

Russell, J.

A woman can neither stand surety for her husband’s debts nor .lawfully pay them, and if, having executed a promissory note as security for her husband, she pays the note, she may maintain an action for money had and received and recover the sum so paid, from the creditor who knowingly received it. Strickland v. Vance, 99 Ga. 531 (27 S. E. 152). As to other persons she may not lawfully become surety, but she may pay their debts. Villa Rica Lumber Co. v. Paratain, 92 Ga. 370 (17 S. E. 340). Hence, if a married woman executes a promissory note as surety for a person other than her husband, she can not be compelled by law to páy it, but if she voluntarily pays it, she can not recover back from the creditor the amount she has paid.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Booth v. Merchants Bank of Valdosta, 72 S.E. 44, 9 Ga. App. 650, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 276 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

72 S.E. 44 (Booth v. Merchants Bank of Valdosta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Villa Rica Lumber Co. v. Paratain
17 S.E. 340 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893)
Strickland v. Vance
27 S.E. 152 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)