Booth v. Galt

58 Cal. 254
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1881
DocketNo. 7,160
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 58 Cal. 254 (Booth v. Galt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Booth v. Galt, 58 Cal. 254 (Cal. 1881).

Opinion

The Court :

Appellant relies upon the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision and judgment. The only question which the Court had to determine was whether a conveyance from William Galt to his wife, Margaret Galt, was in fraud of, and void as to, a creditor of said William upon a pre-existing debt. We have examined the evidence as to the bona fides of the husband and wife in the conveyance, by the former to the latter, of the premises in controversy, and we are not satisfied that the findings of the Court are not so far supported by it, as to preclude this Court from disturbing the judgment. The declaration of homestead was clearly invalid.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michelman v. Frye
238 Cal. App. 2d 698 (California Court of Appeal, 1965)
In re Morse
237 F. Supp. 579 (S.D. California, 1964)
Strangman v. Duke
295 P.2d 12 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)
Johnson v. Brauner
281 P.2d 50 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
Schuler-Knox Co. v. Smith
144 P.2d 47 (California Court of Appeal, 1943)
Reid v. Englehart-Davidson Mercantile Co.
58 P. 1063 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Cunha v. Hughes
54 P. 535 (California Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Cal. 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booth-v-galt-cal-1881.