Booth v. . Fordham

77 N.E. 1189, 185 N.Y. 535, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 938
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 1, 1906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner and Chase, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J. Not sitting: Hiscock, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Booth v. . Fordham, 77 N.E. 1189, 185 N.Y. 535, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 938 (N.Y. 1906).

77 N.E. 1189 (Booth v. . Fordham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. Roberts
206 Misc. 779 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)