Booth v. Duffy Homes, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Booth v. Duffy Homes, Inc.

2009 Ohio 1392, 121 Ohio St. 3d 358

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 1, 2009

Docket2008-2258

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2009 Ohio 1392 (Booth v. Duffy Homes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Booth v. Duffy Homes, Inc., 2009 Ohio 1392, 121 Ohio St. 3d 358 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of whether the court of appeals’ judgment should be modified in view of our opinion in Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc., 121 Ohio St.3d 66, 2009-Ohio-1, 902 N.E.2d 10.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would not accept the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of whether the court of appeals’ judgment should be modified in view of our opinion in Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc., 121 Ohio St.3d 66, 2009-Ohio-1, 902 N.E.2d 10.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent and would not accept the appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2009 Ohio 1392, 121 Ohio St. 3d 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booth-v-duffy-homes-inc-ohio-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack