Booth v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Booth v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.

263 A.D. 725, 31 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4727

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 725 (Booth v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Booth v. Daisy Manufacturing Co., 263 A.D. 725, 31 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by an infant through the alleged negligence of defendants, and by his father to recover for loss of services and medical expenses, order denying motion of defendant Daisy Manufacturing Company, appearing specially, (a) to dismiss the action on the ground that the court has not acquired jurisdiction over it, (b) to vacate the service of the summons and complaint upon it, and (c) allowing it ten days to answer the complaint, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appellant’s time to answer the complaint is extended for ten days after the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by an infant through the alleged negligence of defendants, and by his father to recover for loss of services and medical expenses, order denying motion of defendant Daisy Manufacturing Company, appearing specially, (a) to dismiss the action on the ground that the court has not acquired jurisdiction over it, (b) to vacate the service of the summons and complaint upon it, and (c) allowing it ten days to answer the complaint, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Appellant’s time to answer the complaint is extended for ten days after the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 725, 31 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/booth-v-daisy-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1941.