Booth v. CLINTON MACHINE COMPANY
773 N.W.2d 902, 485 Mich. 934, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 2572
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Booth v. CLINTON MACHINE COMPANY. Read the opinion of the Court — 481 Mich. 859 →
Opinion
Francis M. BOOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CLINTON MACHINE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 18, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Booth v. CLINTON MACHINE COMPANY, 773 N.W.2d 902, 485 Mich. 934, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 2572 (Mich. 2009).
773 N.W.2d 902 (Booth v. CLINTON MACHINE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.