Booth v. Chambers

District Court, S.D. Georgia·Decided September 6, 2023·No. 3:23-cv-00060·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA s. DUBLIN DIVISION DELROY T. BOOTH, ) □ □□

Plaintiff, ; OM v. CV 323-060 WARDEN CHAMBERS, Defendant.

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 2), DISMISSES this action without prejudice, and CLOSES this civil action. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this case, he should be required to initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of anew complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). ee SO ORDERED this Ly Yay of September, 2023, at Augusta, Georgia. (/

ONIED SES DTRICT IGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Booth v. Chambers, (S.D. Ga. 2023).

Booth v. Chambers (Booth v. Chambers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

William A. Dupree v. R. W. Palmer
284 F.3d 1234 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)