Booth v. Brown

Supreme Court of Florida

Booth v. Brown

82 So. 816, 78 Fla. 315

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 11, 1919·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having been heretofore submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid and argument "of counsel for the [316]*316respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— This cause having been heretofore submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment aforesaid and argument "of counsel for the [316]*316respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

All concur.

Booth v. Brown, 82 So. 816, 78 Fla. 315 (Fla. 1919).

Pincite

82 So. 816 (Booth v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.